Updatee – News

thumbnail

Bawal on the third umpire’s decision in WPL, the impact on the results of the match; From Mithali Raj to these veterans surrounded

Womens Premier League 2025

Image source: wpl/screengrab/x
Mumbai Indians vs Delhi Capitals

The second match of the third season of the Women’s Premier League has become a topic of discussion among the fans due to the controversial decisions of the third umpire, which has seen a reaction from Mithali Raj to former RCB team head coach Mike Hessen. The second match of WPL 2025 at Vadodara was played between Mumbai Indians and Delhi Capitals, in which the Delhi team won the match with 2 runs off the last ball. While completing the second run on this ball, an appeal was also made against Arundhati Reddy for a run -out but third umpire Gayatri Venugopalan considered this not out after seeing the replays which managed to win the Delhi team.

After this decision of the third umpire, while Mumbai Indians team captain Harmanpreet Kaur did not appear happy at all, while Mithali Raj, Mike Hessen and Lisa site also expressed their unhappiness and also spoke after the match about the rules. . In this match, not just questions about this one decision of the third umpire, but something similar was seen in three consecutive overs.

Third umpire was probably not focused on Jingle Bells

In this match, the team of Delhi Capitals got a target of 165 runs, chasing them 163 runs in 19.5 overs. Arundhati Reddy, who was batting on the last ball, played a shot in the air but he could only cross 30 yards on which he tried to take 2 runs. While completing the second run, when Reddy was back inside his crease, at the same time the wicketkeeper of Mumbai Indians dropped the wicket with a throw, after which this whole decision was taken to the third umpire. The third umpire was surprised as soon as not out after seeing the replays. Actually, when the wicketkeeper hit the ball on the wicket, Arundhati’s bat was slightly out of the crease and the stump light was also burnt due to the removal of LED Bells, but when the next frame was seen, the bails were completely removed from the wicket but Reddy’s Reddy’s Wicket was completely removed. The bat had come inside a little of the crease, after which there is now a dispute about this decision.

Mithali Raj raised questions on the decision of third umpire

In the match between Mumbai Indians and Delhi Capitals, former Indian team captain Mithali Raj was playing the role of commentator, in which he reacted to the third umpire decisions after the match and said that two runs related to Shikha Pandey and Radha Yadav The decisions of the out should have been in favor of the Mumbai Indians team. Pandey was given not out while his bat was on the line. When you dive and your bat first collides with the ground inside the crease and then it jumps up. Because you have to dive the whole, it is not out. But in the case of Radha Yadav, we can see the blade of the bat above. It is not touching any part of the land inside the crease. When LED stump burns. This means that he is out. The bat was never in the crease, it is almost out.

Why did the umpire decide that Jinger Bells would not apply

Apart from Mithali Raj, former head coach of RCB team Mike Hessen also tweeted on X, while tweeting on X, I wrote that I do not know that today the umpire decided that today the umpire decided that Jinger Bells will not apply? Once the bails are burnt, the connection breaks, so the wicket disintegrates. It occurs in sports conditions. There has never been a confusion like the last 10 minutes.

Also read

Ravichandran Ashwin advised to overcome this thing, said-We are cricketers, not an actor

33 -year -old fast bowler sold most expensive in auction, this franchise team bought

Latest cricket news



Source link

Leave a Comment